The ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter is a sampling calorimeter with its absorber and electrode plates interleaved with liquid Argon (LAr) gaps. These plates have a characteristic accordion shape and 1024 of them are arranged in a cylindrical configuration providing hermetic and uniform $\phi$ coverage of the proton-proton interaction region at the heart of the ATLAS detector. The whole cylinder is actually composed of 16 modules, with the use of 64 accordion plates for each module. The geometry of this calorimeter has been previously described with Geant3, a FORTRAN based simulation package. Recently we have employed Geant4, a package developed by the High Energy Physics community using object oriented programming (C++). Two approaches have been used for the description of this geometry. One describes the full $2 \pi$ volume with the use of trapezoidal, semi-cylindrical and parallelepiped volumes and thus all information for each accordion-shaped volume around the full azimuth is present. The other approach makes use of the Geant4 toolkit to define a new generic Accordion shape in which the relative positions/thicknesses of the LAr, absorber, and readout electrode volumes are all defined. Then, only the $\phi$-position of each accordion volume is defined and thus a smaller number of parameters is used to describe the whole electromagnetic calorimeter. Consequently, this approach is more memory-friendly which is especially useful when constructing large multi-volume detectors. One part of this contribution deals with the extensive comparisons between the two geometry models which are performed in order
to prove the validity of the novel approach. The other part deals with the physics validation of the Geant4 product. One of the calorimeter modules has been tested at CERN and its response to muons and electrons is studied. Geant4 is used to describe the complete geometry of the test beam setup (cryostats, etc.), as well as to also simulate the deposited energy in this electromagnetic calorimeter module. Preliminary results on the comparisons between test beam data and the Geant3 and Geant4 simulations of the calorimeter's response to muons and electrons are presented. |
|